Image

∆P gauge quickly spots leakage

Jan. 16, 2014
Fluid-power assemblies must be tested for leakage. The three traditional, low-tech approaches for doing so are:

Fluid power assemblies must be tested for leakage. The three traditional, low-tech approaches for doing so are:

  • Filling the assembly with compressed air, then slopping soapy water on it to see if bubbles reveal leaks.
  • Immersing the whole assembly in a water bath, then pressurizing it with air — again, watching for bubbles.
  • Pressurizing the sealed assembly and watching a gauge for pressure decay.

At best, these methods are cumbersome and time-consuming. At worst, they add drying and corrosion problems. All interrupt production flow. A simple, high-speed leakage test, suitable for production work, can be assembled from a differential-pressure gauge, a pair of two-way valves, and a vessel that is known to be leak-free. The circuit is shown in the accompanying illustration.

With the test assembly in place, valve A is opened to pressurize both volumes. The gauge will read zero. Then valves A and B are closed. Because the reference volume holds pressure, any leakage from the test assembly immediately results in a measurable differential that registers on the gauge.

The leakage rate can be calculated from the formula:

L = (∆P × VS)/(PA × t),

where L = flow, in scfm; ∆P = differential pressure, in psi; VS= assembly volume, in ft3; PA = atmospheric pressure, in psi; and t = time, in minutes.

Joe Gordon, chief engineer, Differential Pressure Plus Inc., Branford, Conn., suggested this test configuration. Call him at (203) 481-2545 for more information, or visit www.differentialpressure.com.

Continue Reading

Jan. 13, 2020
The goal is to match kinetic energy of the press to the work required. It’s seldom quite that simple.
Oct. 31, 2023
Electrification and automation are among the major trends influencing the design of hydraulics and other components for agricultural equipment.