Manufacturing past and present

The Need for Continuous Improvement

June 3, 2020
In these times of chaos and uncertainty, a manufacturing analogy may provide us with some reassurance.

Machines behave according to the laws of physics. The planet operates according to the laws of nature. Those laws are finite and uncompromising. Humans have their own set of laws, and while some of those also depend on physics and nature, most others are left to the inconsistencies of the people who apply them.

And in times of chaos and uncertainty—and these times certainly qualify—we often seek large solutions and grand gestures to alleviate those concerns and quell the crisis. It might be helpful to look at these times in terms of a manufacturing plant to see the way forward.

The plant is not, in fact, a single entity. It is a collection of systems and machines and individual operators. There are common goals, but only when each of the individual pieces work together as a seamless unit does the plant achieve its full potential. When one part breaks down or when one line doesn’t operate efficiently, the impact is felt everywhere. And if leadership isn’t tuned into the needs of each of the parts, the whole cannot succeed.

But there are all kinds of leadership in a plant. The top-down management style can work, but only if there is a full understanding of how each of the individual pieces work together, and if there is empathy for the workers at the bottom of the organizational chart. And middle-out management also is effective, but only if the goals for the upper management and the line workers both are realized.

Bottom-up management isn’t a management style at all. It’s what we call personal responsibility. If each worker takes full responsibility for performing tasks at the highest level, the entire organization cannot help but succeed.

It’s one thing to make an argument for personal responsibility against the geopolitical background we face today, but we too often apply that standard to others. There are certain things out of our individual control. If we manage our work and our family and ourselves with commitment and integrity, we will have done all we can right now to affect change.

But we have a term in manufacturing for that: It’s called “continuous improvement.” We need to embrace that idea to help us make ourselves, and each system we work on, just a little better every day.

About the Author

Bob Vavra | Senior Content Director, Power & Motion and Machine Design

Bob Vavra is the Senior Content Director of Power & Motion and its sister publication Machine Design. Vavra has had a long career in publishing, media and events. He has covered all aspects of manufacturing for the past 20 years and is a regular attendee at events such as IMTS and Hannover Messe. Vavra is also a sought-after webcast moderator and event emcee, and has presided over events in the U.S., Germany and China. 

Continue Reading

Oct. 5, 2022
Through mergers and acquisitions, companies have the opportunity innovate faster and serve new markets.
Jan. 13, 2020
The goal is to match kinetic energy of the press to the work required. It’s seldom quite that simple.

Sponsored Recommendations

Feb. 6, 2024
Newcomers to medical device design may think pressure and flow rate are sufficient parameters whenselecting a pump. While this may be true in some industrial applications, medical...
Feb. 6, 2024
Variable volume pumps, also known as precision dispense pumps, are a positive displacement pump that operates by retracting a piston to aspirate a fluid and then extending the...
Feb. 6, 2024
Acheck valve, a non-return or one-way valve, is a mechanical device that allows a gas or liquid to flow freely in one direction while preventing reverse flow in the opposite ...
Feb. 6, 2024
Engineers tasked with managing fluid flow talk about both holes and calibrated orifices, but they are two distinct entities. A hole can be any opening, but a calibrated orifice...